> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.duvo.ai/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Working with Clarity Outputs and Captures

> Clarity gives you two layers to work with — the generated Current Process and Automation Proposal, and the captures they were built from. When to use each, and how to analyze every interview transcript with Clarity Chat, the Duvo MCP server, or the Duvo CLI.

Every Clarity process has two layers. The **outputs** are what Clarity generates: the Current Process, the Automation Proposal, the process summaries, and the Process Landscape. The **captures** are the sources those outputs were built from: voice interviews, screen recordings, documents, and images, each with its own transcript.

An AI assistant working through Duvo can read both. That means you are not limited to the summary Clarity wrote. You can ask an assistant to go through every interview on a process, compare what different people said, find disagreements the map smoothed over, or pull exact quotes for a business case. This page covers when to use which layer and how to set up an analysis that reads the captures.

## Outputs vs. Captures

| Layer | What it is | Use it when |
| - | - | - |
| **Current Process** | The generated step-by-step description of how the process works today | You need the agreed picture: steps, systems, handoffs, exceptions |
| **Automation Proposal** | The generated proposal for how the process could be improved or automated, with readiness per step | You are scoping automation or building an Agent |
| **Process summaries and Process Landscape** | Summary, SWOT, projected impact, and how processes relate across the organization | You are comparing or prioritizing many processes |
| **Captures** | The interviews, recordings, documents, and images, with full transcripts | You need evidence, nuance, quotes, or the view of one specific person |

The outputs are a synthesis. They merge every capture into one consistent process, which is exactly what you want for a map — and exactly what hides the differences between people. When the question is "who said that?", "do the two warehouses actually do this the same way?", or "what did people complain about that never made it into a step?", go to the captures.

## Where You Can Work with Captures

All of these surfaces respect your access. An assistant sees the processes and captures you can open in Clarity, and nothing more.

* **Clarity Chat** — the **Ask Duvo** box on a process. It reads the generated process and can list and read that process's captures. Best for questions about one process. See [Edit and Ask with Clarity Chat](/user-guide/assignment-features/clarity#edit-and-ask-with-clarity-chat).
* **Ask Duvo across the organization** — organization-wide answers use process summaries. Open a process, or name it in your request, when you need its captures or interview evidence.
* **The Duvo MCP server** — connect Claude Desktop, Cursor, ChatGPT, or another MCP host and ask in plain language. See [Connect to the Duvo MCP server](/mcp/duvo-mcp-server).
* **The Duvo CLI** — the best choice for large analyses, because transcripts can be saved to files and processed in bulk instead of loaded into one conversation. See [Clarity CLI](/cli/clarity).

## Start from the Outputs, Drill into Captures

The most reliable analyses start from the generated process and use captures as evidence, rather than starting from raw transcripts.

<Steps>
  <Step title="Get the shape of the process" icon="map">
    Read the overview and the live Current Process first. In the CLI: `duvo clarity overview <process-id>` and `duvo clarity current <process-id>`.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Find the claim you want to check" icon="search">
    Pick the steps, gaps, or numbers that matter for your question. `duvo clarity gaps <process-id>` groups missing information, open questions, and assumptions by proposed step.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Trace it back to a capture" icon="link">
    `duvo clarity evidence <process-id>` prints a citation ID for each generated step. Resolve one with `--citation <citation-id>` to see the step it supports, the attribution (who or what the evidence came from, such as "Anna (sales interview)"), and the quoted excerpt. A citation does not carry a capture ID, so match the attribution against the list from `duvo clarity captures <process-id>` to find the capture to open.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Read the capture" icon="file-text">
    Read the full transcript of that capture to see what was actually said, in context.
  </Step>
</Steps>

## Analyze Every Capture in a Process

To go through all the interviews on one process, the assistant first lists the captures, then reads each transcript.

**With MCP** (the tools an assistant calls for you):

1. `getClarityProcess` with `captures: "lite"` — returns the process and its captures without transcript text, so the list stays small. Each capture carries its status, who recorded it, and whether a transcript is available.
2. `getClarityCapture` with the `process_id` and `capture_id` — returns one capture with its full transcript and video transcript. Call it once per capture.

**With the CLI**, write the transcripts to a file and let the assistant work from it:

```bash theme={"dark"}
duvo clarity captures <process-id> --json --include-transcripts > captures.json
duvo clarity capture <process-id> <capture-id> --json --include-transcripts
```

Without `--include-transcripts`, capture output contains metadata only. Add the flag whenever you want the text.

<Tip>
  Load transcripts one capture at a time rather than all at once. A process with many long interviews can fill an assistant's context quickly, and a focused read per capture produces better notes than one huge input.
</Tip>

## Analyze Across Many Processes

For a portfolio question — "what do people across all our finance processes say about manual re-keying?" — combine the two layers:

1. Use `listClarityProcessSummaries` (or `duvo clarity process-summaries`) to scan summaries, SWOT, and projected impact across processes and pick the ones that matter. Both are paginated: the CLI returns 5 processes per page (up to 10 with `--limit`), so advance `--offset` until you have reached the `total` in the response. MCP callers page the same way with `limit` and `offset`.
2. For each selected process, read the captures as described above.
3. Ask the assistant to keep notes per capture first and synthesize at the end.

For dozens of processes, prefer the CLI. Run `duvo clarity list --json` to get the process IDs (50 per page, up to 100 with `--limit`; advance `--offset` until you have them all), save each process's captures to its own file with `duvo clarity captures <process-id> --json --include-transcripts`, and point your assistant at the folder. In Claude Code, Cursor, or a similar tool the assistant can then read, search, and compare files without holding every transcript in one conversation.

Process Landscape interviews live at the organization level rather than on a process. Read them with `duvo clarity interviews org list --org <org-id>` and `duvo clarity interviews org get <interview-id> --org <org-id>`, or list landscape captures with `duvo clarity landscape captures --org <org-id> --include-transcripts --json`.

## Write Prompts That Produce Trustworthy Analysis

The assistant can only be as precise as the request. A few habits make the difference:

* **Name the scope.** "Every completed capture on the Invoice approval process" is answerable. "Our interviews" is not.
* **Ask for citations.** Require the capture (or interviewee) behind every finding, and a direct quote for anything important. That makes each claim checkable in seconds.
* **Separate what was said from what was inferred.** Ask the assistant to label conclusions drawn from the process data as its own inference, not as something a person said.
* **Mind capture status.** Ask for completed captures — one that is still recording or processing may not have a finished transcript yet. Excluded captures stay readable, but Duvo leaves them out of analysis and evidence selection, so call them out separately if you include them.
* **Synthesize last.** "Summarize each interview in five bullets, then list where the interviews disagree" beats "summarize the interviews".

Example requests:

* "Go through every completed capture on process `<process-id>`. For each one, list the steps the person described, the systems they use, and the exceptions they mentioned. Then show where their description differs from the live Current Process."
* "Read all interviews on the three returns processes. List every pain point that was mentioned more than once, with the interviewee and a quote for each."
* "For each step in the Automation Proposal marked low readiness, find what the interviewees said about that step and explain what is still unclear."

## Related

<CardGroup cols={2}>
  <Card title="Clarity" icon="map" href="/user-guide/assignment-features/clarity">
    Capture methods, generation, Clarity Chat, and the Process Landscape.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Clarity CLI" icon="terminal" href="/cli/clarity">
    Every `duvo clarity` command, including captures, evidence, and exports.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Connect to the Duvo MCP server" icon="plug" href="/mcp/duvo-mcp-server">
    Use Clarity tools from Claude Desktop, Cursor, or ChatGPT.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Available MCP Tools" icon="list" href="/mcp/available-tools">
    The full list of Clarity tools and what each returns.
  </Card>
</CardGroup>


This documentation is built and hosted on [Mintlify](https://mintlify.com), a developer documentation platform.